Legal Opinion

Fink v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Dolores Fink (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying her claim petition for benefits under section 301(c)(1) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1 We reverse.

Claimant was employed by Walbridge Corporation (employer) for sixteen years as a porcelain spray enamel painter. On April 26, 1990, she began experiencing severe chest pain and breathing difficulty. As a result, she contacted her family physician. She was advised to go to the St. Clair Hospital…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marinelli v. City of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Vazquez v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Roccuzzo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (School District of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Putz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Alfred F. Marinelli v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API