Legal Opinion
Trout v. Williams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 8, 1929No. 19207PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, j.
The question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error herein in Lavina Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank, 137 Okla. 265, 278 Pac. 648, and the rule therein announced followed in Anna Eva Jacobs, nee Carney, v. Sallie E. Ambrisiter et al., 137 Okla. 227, 278 Pac. 653; Lowman v. Sharp, 137 Okla. 300, 279 Pac. 325; Watson v. Ellis, 137 Okla. 300, 279 Pac. 325; Watson v. Richards, 137 Okla. 299, 279 Pac. 326. Said eases are controlling here and decisive of the questions presented in this appeal.
It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper v. Spiro State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Jacobs v. AmbristerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Board of Com'rs of Wagoner County v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Lowman v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Watson v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Red River Valley Trust Co. v. BoswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935