Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Malone

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1986No. 00642Published

1Dissent

POPOVICH, Judge:

I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of appellant’s wife concerning appellant’s self-defense claim and, as a result, holds that appellant should be granted a new trial. For the following reason, I believe that a new trial should not be granted.

Even in the event that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to admit appellant’s wife’s testimony, the error is harmless if it did not contribute to the verdict. The Court in Commonwealth v. Story, 476 Pa. 391, 404, 383 A.2d 155, 162 (1978),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API