Legal Opinion
Puckett v. Russell
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 17, 1937No. 8 Div. 799PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a bill in equity filed by the trustee in bankruptcy for the benefit of creditors of R. W. Puckett, and seeks to set aside certain conveyances in fraud of his creditors. It alleged that at the time of the execution of the conveyances the said R. W. Puckett was indebted to the 'Bank of Hartselle in the approximate sum of $4,000, which was duly filed as a claim against the bankrupt estate. The recitals in this respect conform to the requirements of Harrison v. Stuart, 219 Ala. 405, 122 So. 623, which do not conflict with Cartwright v. West, 185 Ala. 41, 64 So. 293, since…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- McCollum v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Boutwell v. Spurlin Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Birmingham Property Co. v. Jackson Securities & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Crisp v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960