Legal Opinion
Cubilete v. Morales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The hearing officer’s findings of willful misrepresentation, nonverifiable income and breach of rules and regulations are supported by substantial evidence. Moreover, given petitioner’s misconduct over a four-year period, the penalty of termination does not shock one’s sense of fairness, notwithstanding the hardship to petitioner (see Matter of Bland v New York City Hous. Auth., 72 AD3d 528, 528 [2010]; Matter of Smith v New York City Hous. Auth., 40 AD3d 235 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 816 [2007]).
We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and *471find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bland v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Donmartin v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Perrette v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Perrette v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Whitted v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Whitted v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013