Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1939Published

1Concurrence

Taylor, J. (concurring).

In relation to the claims to awards, of the appellant Gerritsen Basin Development Corporation, for real property taken within the confines of the so-called “ broken lands,” which claims are based upon that appellant’s contention that the Dutch grant of 1636 included such “ broken lands,” I am of opinion that the following additional considerations fortify the conclusion of my brother Close that such grant did not include those lands but did include only a “ flat ” on the mainland of Long Island. It did not include the marshy islands and land under water constituting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. People v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Zimmermann v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Zimmermann v. Roessler Hasslacher Chemical CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. People v. Foote, Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API