Mills v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
HALEY, Judge.
In this purse-snatching case, Kathy Ann Mills (“Mills”) maintains that the evidence of force antecedent to or contemporaneous with the taking is insufficient to show she committed robbery and that, accordingly, the trial court erred in convicting her of that crime. We disagree and affirm.
I
FACTS
The relevant facts may be succinctly stated.
Mills was the front seat passenger in a vehicle, which pulled up beside Elizabeth Witcher, who was walking in a Hardee’s parking lot. Mills asked Witcher for directions, and then grabbed Witcher’s pocketbook. As Witcher explained:
I had it hooked…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- George v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Mason v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Pierce v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Dimitric Le'dre Pritchett v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- United States v. GoffiganDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016