Legal Opinion

Swift Co. v. Eanes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1936No. 4548PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Judgment for damages was recovered against appellant by appellees as a result of a collision on a public highway between motor vehicles, viz., a truck driven by the agent of appellant and an automobile being driven by Sue Eanes, one of the ap-pellees herein.

The general nature of the case is for the present sufficiently illustrated by the following special issues submitted to the jury and answered favorably to the appellees:

“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the collision defendant’s truck was being driven in an easterly direction and was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamoryTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Montrief & Montrief v. BraggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Thurman v. ChandlerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of Pampa v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Winn v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Price v. LeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Blasberg v. CockerellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API