Legal Opinion

In re Mason

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1937No. Patent Appeal No. 3740PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

After allowing certain claims in appellants’ application for a patent relating to fluid transmission, the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office refused to allow claims 1 to' 4, inclusive, and 7 to 12, inclusive, of which claims 1 and 11 are illustrative and read:

“1. In a water supply system comprising a main conduit and a pump for maintaining a water pressure, means for suppressing pulsations of the water pressure due to the pump comprising a side branch from said conduit adapted to retain a volume of entrapped air when the main conduit is filled with…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ArnoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Fluor Corp. v. Gulf Interstate Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API