Legal Opinion

Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Howlett

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1932No. File No. 5994Published

1OpinionBurr, J.

(On rehearing.) The intervenors urge that Caroline How-lett is not a “third party” in this suit; that there is a “serious inaccuracy” in the opinion; and that the testimony of these twelve witnesses discussed in the opinion is admissible.

The inaccuracy referred to consists of this statement in the opinion that Mrs. Howlett “as far back as 1919” stated to the twelve witnesses, or some of them, that the girls were the owners of the sheep; whereas it should be “as far back as 1915.” The testimony- does show it was as far back as 1915.

A reargument was ordered on this proposition only, to wit: was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Avery v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
  2. Griswold v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API