Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Cascade Timber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1932No. 23331. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtHerman, J.

Alfred B. Conrad and Mary E. Conrad, his wife,, sued to recover damages from defendant. W. F. McTee also brought suit to recover damages from defendant. Both causes of action were based upon the alleged negligence of defendant in setting fires to burn logging slashing and permitting the fires to spread, thereby damaging the plaintiffs’ properties. Later, Alfred B. Conrad was substituted for plaintiff in the action brought by McTee, and the two cases were consolidated for trial in the superior court. Verdicts were returned' in favor of plaintiffs in each of the cases. Defendant prosecuted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardy v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Hardy v. Hines Bros. LumberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Mensik v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wood & Iverson, Inc. v. Northwest Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API