United States v. Jaime Estrada-Fernandez Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendants-appellants Jaime Estrada-Fernandez and Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez appeal their convictions for assault with a dangerous weapon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). They contend that the district court erred in failing to give certain lesser-included-offense instructions to the jury. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s judgment of conviction and sentence as to Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez, and we reverse the district court’s judgment of conviction and sentence as to Jaime Estrada-Fernandez.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 22,1996, correctional…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Frederick v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Hector Luis Lopez Andino, United States of America v. Israel Mendez SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Jose A. GuilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. AvantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Benjamin Godfrey Chipps, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- People v. ColvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.