Legal Opinion

United States v. Jaime Estrada-Fernandez Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1998No. 97-10661PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants-appellants Jaime Estrada-Fernandez and Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez appeal their convictions for assault with a dangerous weapon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). They contend that the district court erred in failing to give certain lesser-included-offense instructions to the jury. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s judgment of conviction and sentence as to Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez, and we reverse the district court’s judgment of conviction and sentence as to Jaime Estrada-Fernandez.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December 22,1996, correctional…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Frederick v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Hector Luis Lopez Andino, United States of America v. Israel Mendez SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Jose A. GuilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. AvantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Benjamin Godfrey Chipps, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. People v. ColvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API