Legal Opinion

Rios v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Concur — Capozzoli, Nunez and Macken, JJ.; Eager, J. P., and McNally, J., dissent in the following memorandum by McNally, J.: I dissent and vote to affirm. The plaintiff-appellant has failed to submit a reasonable excuse in moving to open plaintiff’s default. The application for a two-week adjournment was predicated on alleged family problems of plaintiff in Puerto Rico. No application was made to have the case assigned for trial subject to the alleged engagement of trial counsel. In addition, plaintiff has failed to show a meritorious cause of action. The affidavit of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Titus v. HalstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. The Fitzgerald Manufacturing Company v. . AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heist v. CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API