Legal Opinion
In re D.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 5, 2010No. 03-07-00426-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.
Appellant D.H. was charged with possession of marihuana in a drug-free zone. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.121, .134 (West Supp.2009). She filed a pre-trial motion to suppress, which the trial court overruled. D.H. then pled true pursuant to a plea agreement, and the trial court adjudicated her delinquent and placed her on probation for eight months. On appeal, D.H. complains that the evidence was obtained in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. See U.S. Const, amend. IV (barring unreasonable searches and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burlison Ex Rel. CM v. Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Burlison Ex Rel. CM v. Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- In Re DH, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Mellony Burlison v. Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013