Legal Opinion · Dissent

Philadelphia & Reading Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 4, 1991No. 90-3520Published

1DissentBecker, Circuit Judge

In the first of the four judicial opinions dealing with this controversy, Judge Marshall observed that “when the tax collector blunders ... the taxpayer will go free.” Philadelphia & Reading Corp. v. Beck, No. 73-C-3138, slip op. at 13, 1980 WL 1734 (N.D.I11. Aug. 29, 1980). Indeed! As the result of Mrs. Ballard’s blunder, perpetuated by her superior in the IRS Kansas City regional office, the taxpayer, notwithstanding that it ultimately got exactly what it bargained for in its dealings with IRS, will receive what Judge Cummings in the second opinion in this case, and Judge Wright in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Corp. v. BeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Steiner v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  4. Parsons Corporation, Ralph M. Parsons Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API