Legal Opinion

Kalio Universal, Inc. v. BAM, INC.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 15, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

95 N.J. Super. 393 (1967)

231 A.2d 376

KALIO UNIVERSAL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

B.A.M. INC., MATURFLEX KNITTING MILLS CORPORATION, AND FAWN HOSIERY COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 19, 1966.

Decided June 15, 1967.

Before Judges LEWIS, LABRECQUE and GOLDMANN.

Mr. Abraham H. Carchman argued the cause for appellant Maturflex Knitting Mills Corporation.

Mr. Clifford W. Starrett argued the cause for respondent Kalio Universal, Inc. (Messrs. Schenck, Price, Smith & King, attorneys).

The opinion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Earl v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Bell v. Eastern Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Kurtz v. OremlandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. Kopec v. KakowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. SP Dunham & Co. v. KudraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Danesi v. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  2. Ferrante Equipment Co. v. Foley MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Arnone v. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Ally Financial Inc. v. PiraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. Ally Financial Inc. v. PiraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API