Legal Opinion

Holdampf v. A.C. & S., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gonzalez, J.

This appeal involves the question of whether defendant owed a duty of care to a specific plaintiff who claims to have suffered foreseeable injuries as a result of defendant’s negligent acts or omissions. Specifically, we must decide whether defendant Port Authority may be liable to plaintiff wife for serious injuries allegedly resulting from her second-hand exposure to asbestos while laundering her husband’s asbestos-contaminated work clothes during the 30-year period he was employed by the Port Authority.

Applying well-established principles of common-law…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zimko v. American CyanamidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Matter of Nyc Asbestos LitigNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Martin v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API