Legal Opinion
United States v. Ryan Mudd
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2012No. 10-41320PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Ryan James Mudd appeals his conviction and sentence on a single count of possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Mudd argues that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; and (2) a conflict exists between the district court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing and written judgment. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM Mudd’s conviction, VACATE his sentence in part, and REMAND this case to the district court.
I
On February 12, 2009, two Texas parole officers and a Corpus Christi police…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- U.S. v. MergersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Pedro Resio-TrejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Thomas De LeonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Angela Faye Onick and Alvin TolliverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Rosie DigglesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jonathan WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Talvin LawingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jonathan Rivas-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Otis Mays, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.