Frank Parmelee Co. v. Wheelock
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph B. Gaby, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1905.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. J ustioe Freeman
delivered the opinion of the court.
The first contention of appellant’s attorneys is that the verdict and judgment are excessive. Giving full consideration to the influence of a pending suit for damages and the possibility that the condition of appellee’s right nostril, which is nearly closed as a result of the injury, might be improved by an operation, there is yet evidence tending to show that appellee received an injury not only painful and disfiguring, but which has left perma'nent ill consequences, by no means of a trivial nature. The nose was so badly broken that it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShackletIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. GemmillIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Railway Co. v. UllrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- St. Louis, Belleville & Suburban Co. v. HopkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. EggmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartray v. A. T. Willett Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1924
- Krebs Hop Co. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1908