Bainbridge Farm Co. v. Ball
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtNines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The petition does not make a ease for the relief sought by petitioners against the defendants. Under their lease the petitioners could cup for turpentine purposes only trees measuring eight inches and over, eighteen inches from the ground; and they had no right to cup trees of less size, or trees which were reserved by the defendants under this lease. Petitioners admit that they had been doing both of these things. In these circumstances the officers of the defendant company had the right to count the trees and measure the' lands for the purpose of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swanson v. KirbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Camp v. Dixon, Mitchell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Moore & Co. v. Daugherty, Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Spencer v. TumlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Brown v. RedwyneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chapman v. FaughnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Winn v. National Bank of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Anderson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941