Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. LOCAL UNION 611, INTERNATIONAL HOD CARRIERS'BUILDING AND COMMON LABORERS'UNION OF AMERICA
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 11, 1964No. 3:96-r-00001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is based upon the claim that the time within which the Secretary of Labor is directed to bring an action un der § 402(b) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (29 U.S.C. § 482(b)) operates as a statute of limitations. What happened in this case was that a member of defendant Local 611 filed his complaint with the Secretary of Labor on September 12, 1962; an investigation was made and probable cause found. The action, however, was not brought until November 13, 1962, sixty-two days after the filing of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Joint Council Dining Car Employees Local 370 v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Rutledge v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wirtz v. Local Union 169, International Hod Carriers', Building & Common Laborers' Union of America, AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1965
- In the Matter of American Healthcare Management, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Debtor. Chapman Investment Associates v. American Healthcare ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Holodnak v. AVCO CORP., AVCO-LYCOMING D., STRATFORD, CONN.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Peninsula Shipbuilders AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Johnson v. HarperDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.