Stehle v. Stehle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Catharine Stehle, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 7th day of February, 1898, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff, Catharine Stehle, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 7th day of February, 1898, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term. The plaintiff and her late husband occupied the premises described in the complaint, situated on Clifford street in the city of Rochester, which were conveyed to the defendants by a quitclaim deed executed on the 14th day of July, 1896, which recited a consideration, viz.: “ Of the sum of good and lawful…
1Per curiam
The leading theory of the complaint seems to be that the consideration for the premises had not been rendered to the plaintiff, and that the deed made by her and her late husband to the defendants ought to be set aside. There was no return of any consideration or benefits received by the plaintiff or her husband under the deed, nor was there any allegation in the complaint of fraud or mutual mistake, and in that aspect the action ought not to-be maintained. Eowever, the defendants have not paid the consideration' which they agreed to for the premises. They expressly stipulated, when they…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Waterson, Berlin & Snyder Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Grote v. GroteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Fain v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Kinney v. . KinneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Redpath v. RedpathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.