Legal Opinion

In re Dense

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1946No. 5173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting, in view of the prior art, all of the claims, 1 to 5 inclusive, of an application for a patent alleging “new and useful improvements in Floor Mat.” The cited references are: Ellis, 1,784,803, December 9, 1930, and Glyco Chemicals, page 27, July 1938. From tliat decision this appeal was taken.

Claims 1 and 4 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:

1. A floor mat comprising a supporting layer and an outer tacky layer of wax-like material haying a tread…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re RockwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of BennerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  2. Application of AronbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API