Legal Opinion

Walczak v. Walczak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Generally, in matrimonial matters, the courts have adopted a liberal policy of vacating default judgments (see, Schrader v Schrader, 152 AD2d 987; Otto v Otto, 150 AD2d 57, 60; Black v Black, 141 AD2d 689; Antonovich v Antonovich, 84 AD2d 799). The vacatur of a default judgment, however, is discretionary with the court (see, Black v Black, supra, at 689; Candeloro v Candeloro, 133 AD2d 731) and it is still incumbent upon the moving defendant to proffer a reasonable excuse for the default and to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Antonovich v. AntonovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Black v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Candeloro v. CandeloroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Schrader v. SchraderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arvanetes v. ArvanetesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Hansen v. HansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. T.S. v. E.L.New York City Family Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API