Legal Opinion
Claim of McGarry v. Catapano & Grow Construction Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 1978Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The Workmen’s Compensation Board considered this claim under a statute which provides that "testimony may be taken, either directly or through a referee and if an award is made it shall be against the special fund provided by this section” (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 25-a, subd 1). The decision of the board, made following a hearing, that there had been no closing of the case and that liability was "that of the primary carrier, and not that of the Special Fund for Reopened Cases”, was final as to all questions of fact (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 20),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Free School District No. 2 v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Dennison v. Peckham Road Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Matter of McCarter v. LarockNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Bellini v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.