Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
CLARIFYING MEMORANDUM RE DECISIONS INTERPRETING THE TERM “PROJECT WATER,” DOCS. 761 and 834.
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
The parties have recently raised questions regarding the application of shortage provisions to the term “Project Water,” as that term is used in the Sacramento River Settlement Contracts (“SRS Contracts”), and discussed in the November 19, 2008 Memorandum Decision Re Cross Motions For Summary Judgment Re CVP Contract Rescission, 2008 WL 5054115 (“November 19, 2008 Decision”), Doc. 761, and April 27, 2009, 621 F.Supp.2d 954, Supplemental Memorandum Decision Re Cross…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edwin R. O'Neill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Consolidated Salmonid CasesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Natural Resources Defense Coun v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. LockeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.