Legal Opinion

Bowser Et Ux. v. Patton Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1947No. Appeal, 122PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Appellants, tenants under an agricultural lease of a farm owned by appellees, are here attempting to receive two crops for one year’s rental, an unheard of proposition either under the common law or the general custom in Pennsylvania. There is no statute on the subject.

Under the common law a tenant for years had no right to a crop of grain sown by him during a term and coming to maturity after its expiration. Littleton, Section 68.

The common law has been modified in Pennsylvania by a general custom, that has the status of a general law, that where a lease commences in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Whorley v. KarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Comfort v. Duncan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1836

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swanson v. CarlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API