Legal Opinion
Hexcel Corporation v. Ineos Polymers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2012No. 10-56765PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Hexcel Corporation (Hexcel) sued Defendant-Appellee Ineos Polymers, Inc., formerly known as BP Amoco Polymers, Inc. (BP Amoco) on November 26, 2008 for antitrust injuries it allegedly suffered as the result of a carbon fiber price-fixing scheme, beginning in 1992. To avoid the effect of the applicable four-year statute of limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 15b, Hexcel contends that the statute of limitations was tolled due to fraudulent concealment by BP Amoco. Hexcel contends that because of BP Amoco’s fraudulent concealment, it neither knew, nor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tworivers v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Malave-Torres v. CusidoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Genberg v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Cline v. Reetz-LaioloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.