Legal Opinion
Shon v. Subaru of America, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1988No. 87CA0062PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRISWELL, Judge.
The primary question presented by this appeal is whether it is the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (the Colorado act), § 10-4-701 et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 4A), or its Pennsylvania counterpart, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 40, § 1009.101, et seq. (Purdon 1971 and Supp.1987) (the Pennsylvania act) that governs the right of an insurance carrier, which issued a complying policy under the Colorado act, to be reimbursed out of the proceeds from the settlement of the beneficiary’s third-party tort claim. We conclude that the carrier’s sub-rogation rights are governed by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Toter v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pryor v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Hahn v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. v. KingColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- ITT Specialty Risk Services v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998