Legal Opinion
Healy Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1969No. 41513PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiff, Healy Plumbing and Heating Company (hereinafter Healy), from the judgment entered pursuant to an order of the district court granting the motion of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company (hereinafter Travelers) for summary judgment.
The Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District' was created and exists under and by virtue of Minn. St. c. 445. Section 445.15 provides in part:
“Bonds shall be required from contractors for any works of construction as provided in and subject to all the provisions of sections 574.26 to 574.31.”
Section 574.26, so far…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- La Mourea v. RhudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Ceco Steel Products Corp. v. TapagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Wilcox Lumber Co. v. School District No. 268Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson Roofing & Contracting, Inc. v. C. W. Moore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Den Mar Construction Co. v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- HEALY PLUMB. & HEAT. CO. v. Mpls.-St. Paul San. Dist.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969