Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Loyola Perpetual Building Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 24, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore'City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was argued before Alvey, C. J., Miller, Robinson, Irving, Bryan, McSherry, and Briscoe, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, J.

The appellant executed and delivered to the appellee four mortgages, each conveying a separate parcel of property then lying within the outlines of Baltimore County. Each mortgage contained a consent to a sale under the provisions of Article 64 of the Code of Public General Laws of 1860, (now Art. 66 of the Code of 1888,) upon the mortgagor failing to perform any of the mortgage covenants, and continuing in default for three successive months. The mortgages provided that the sale should cibe made in accordance with said provisions by Richard Bernard, the attorney of said mortgagee,” &c. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chilton v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Preske v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Webster v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Forest Lake Cemetery v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Clemens v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Buckner v. CronhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API