Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. R. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1909No. 1,492PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. For opinion below, see 152 Fed. 314. Before. GILBERT and MORROW, Circuit judges, and DE HAVEN, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

'Phis is an appeal by the defendants from a decree of the Circuit Court, Southern district of California, annulling a patent issued by tlie United States to the defendant Southern Pacific Railroad Company for certain lands in the state of California.

The bill of complaint alleges, and the agreed statement of facts shows, that part of the land so patented is situated within the primary and part within the indemnity limits of the grant of land made to the Atlantic & Pacific Railroad Company by the act of Congress approved July 27, I860, c. 278, 11 Stat. 292. The Atlantic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Ryan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. In Re Amendments to Rules 1 and 10Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API