Keefover v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
The trial court entered judgment against the Director of Revenue as a discovery sanction for failure to respond to interrogatories that requested information that the Director has stated she did not have, did not know, or was not reasonably available to her.
*76-82Respondent Robert Joe Keefover was arrested for driving while intoxicated, and consented to, and was given, a breathalyzer test, which indicated a blood-alcohol content of .19%. Thereafter, his driving privileges were suspended and he petitioned for trial de novo. Interrogatories, and a Request for Production of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arth v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Sherrod v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Green v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Richardson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- McDermott v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000