Legal Opinion

Keefover v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1999No. 74958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

The trial court entered judgment against the Director of Revenue as a discovery sanction for failure to respond to interrogatories that requested information that the Director has stated she did not have, did not know, or was not reasonably available to her.

*76-82Respondent Robert Joe Keefover was arrested for driving while intoxicated, and consented to, and was given, a breathalyzer test, which indicated a blood-alcohol content of .19%. Thereafter, his driving privileges were suspended and he petitioned for trial de novo. Interrogatories, and a Request for Production of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arth v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Sherrod v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Green v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Richardson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. McDermott v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API