Legal Opinion

Maxherman Co. v. Alper

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

Motion for judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the same, as amplified by bills of particulars, does not state a cause of action. The complaint is in common form for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendants and on the face thereof sufficiently states a cause of action for the agreed price or reasonable value of the goods. Plaintiff in its bills of particulars, however, expressly disclaims any express contract of sale with defendants, stating its theory to be that the action is on a quasi contract on the following alleged facts: That plaintiff sold the goods in suit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Empire State Type Founding Co. v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Smith v. . LynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Hirsch Lumber Co. v. HubbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API