People v. Powell
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
JUSTICE THEIS,
specially concurring:
I concur in the result reached by the majority, but write separately because I do not join in that portion of the majority opinion which addresses the proportionality of the 20-year mandatory sentencing enhancement provision for first-degree murder. 730 ILCS 5/5 — 8— 1 (a)(1)(d)(ii) (West 2000).
Defendant has no standing to raise this issue. Courts will not consider the validity of a statutory provision unless the person challenging the provision is directly affected by it or the unconstitutional feature is so pervasive as to render the entire statute…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In re C.E.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re CEIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Hill v. CowanIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.