Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Powell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 2004No. 1-03-1008Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE THEIS,

specially concurring:

I concur in the result reached by the majority, but write separately because I do not join in that portion of the majority opinion which addresses the proportionality of the 20-year mandatory sentencing enhancement provision for first-degree murder. 730 ILCS 5/5 — 8— 1 (a)(1)(d)(ii) (West 2000).

Defendant has no standing to raise this issue. Courts will not consider the validity of a statutory provision unless the person challenging the provision is directly affected by it or the unconstitutional feature is so pervasive as to render the entire statute…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In re C.E.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re CEIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hill v. CowanIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API