Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Becker

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The motion of the United States government to vacate the two orders, dated February 18, 1939, and December 5, 1939, denying the application to compel the executors to account, is denied. The first application for a compulsory accounting was denied in a brief decision (N. Y. L. J. Feb. 15, 1939, p. 729). A second application was made and was again denied at some length (N. Y. L. J. Nov. 25, 1939, p. 1795). In my disposition of the matter, I pointed out that the government’s attempt to collect an inheritance tax upon additional assets was without foundation in fact or in law. No…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. In Re the Accounting of SchorerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of ClayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of FrommeltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of FerberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WeinbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  2. In re the Estate of MayerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  3. In re the Estate of ScadronNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  4. In re the Estate of FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Schofield EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Warren County · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API