Legal Opinion

State v. Hakon

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of Ward county; Goss, J. Defendants were convicted of maliciously poisoning horses, and appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Morgan, Ch. J.

The defendants were informed against for the offense of wilfully poisoning domestic animals, and the charging part of the information is as follows: “ . . . did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously administer poison, . . . to a domestic animal, to wit, a certain horse, then and there and by the means aforesaid causing the death of said horse, said horse then and there being the property of one Mike Nazema.” After arraignment, the defendants demurred to the information, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. This demurrer was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HazlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State v. MalmbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. EmptingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. MoellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. KeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. RiggleWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Richardson v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. PanchukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API