Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chad A. Madden v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 2015No. 39A01-1404-CR-173Published

1DissentRiley, Judge

I disagree with the majority that the trial court did not improperly delegate its authority to Community Corrections to determine whether, and for what duration, Madden should be subject to electronic monitoring — i. e., home detention — as a condition of his probation. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Indiana’s probation statute unambiguously states that “[w]henever it places a person on probation, the court shall ... specify in the record the conditions of the probation.” Ind.Code § 35-38-2-l(a)(l) (emphasis added). Specifically, “the court may require a person to do [any] combination” of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jesus S. Gil v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Million v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Dulin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Disney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API