Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 1, 1903No. 1,006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaweey, District Judge

(orally). The motion in arrest of judgment is made upon the ground that there is no averment in the indictment that the letter alleged to have been written by the defendant was addressed to any person or persons. The rule is universal that in all indictments the facts constituting the offense must be clearly charged, with sufficient certainty. The indictment in this case does not charge that the letter mentio'ned therein, which was deposited by defendant “for mailing and delivery,” was inclosed in an envelope or wrapper containing the address of the person to whom it was to be delivered, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. JanesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896
  3. United States v. FulkersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896
  4. United States v. LynchDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KowanCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API