Legal Opinion · Dissent

W. H. Morton & Co. v. New York State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1983Published

1Dissent

Main and Mikoll, JJ., dissent and vote to annul in the following memorandum by Mikoll, J. Mikoll, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. The determination of the State Tax Commission on this record is arbitrary and unreasonable. The franchise tax imposed does not bear a reasonable relationship to the privilege granted. The franchise tax is a tax imposed on every domestic corporation, with some exceptions, “for the privilege of exercising its corporate franchise, that is to say, for the mere possession of the privilege” (58 NY Jur, Taxation, § 513, p 682; see Brady v State Tax Comm., 176…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. State Tax CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Brady v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. People Ex Rel. Sheraton Bldgs., Inc. v. Tax Comm'n of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. People ex rel. Sheraton Buildings, Inc. v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Brady v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API