Kienitz v. Sager, A.K.A. Kienitz

OPINION OF

STAINBACK, J.

(Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part.)

While I agree that the decree of the chancellor should be reversed, I disagree with the reasons therefor. I disagree with the conclusion that the deeds should be reformed and disagree that the compensation of the respondent should be fixed by this court rather than be returned to the court below which could take evidence to find a proper basis in case a money award should be made to the respondent in addition to her share of the property already deeded to her. I also agree that the marriage of petitioner and respondent was…