Legal Opinion

Puritan Holding Co. v. Holloschitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter M. Schackman, J.

Plaintiff owns a small apartment building, recently renovated, on West 93rd Street in Manhattan, almost directly across the street from a building owned by the defendant. The latter building has been abandoned. Plaintiff claims the defendant has created a nuisance by not properly caring for her property and claims it has suffered damages as a result. Defendant did not appear in the action and an inquest was held before the court.

The uncontroverted proof at trial was that defendant’s building had deteriorated, become unsightly and been taken over by derelicts. The building’s condition has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Dixon v. New York Trap Rock Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Town of Preble v. Song Mountain, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. In the Matter of CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor. Appeal of IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Antun Investments Corp. v. ErgasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API