Legal Opinion

Banning v. Penrose

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 13, 1919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. Petition by C. F. Banning for writ of habeas corpus against C. W. Penrose, Commandant of Ft. Oglethorpe, Ga.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is a proceeding by C. F. Banning against C. W. Penrose, who is commandant of Ft. Oglethorpe, Ga., a military encampment. Mr. Banning asks that, on a writ of habeas corpus, he be discharged from his detention and confinement at Ft. Oglethorpe, where he was interned, as I understand it, by an order of the Attorney General, acting for the President, under section 4067, Rev. St., as amended by the Act of Congress approved April 16, 1918, 40 Stat. L. 531, c. 55 (Comp. St. 1918, § 7615), and the President’s proclamation issued thereunder.

There has been a 'hearing on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SalomonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
  2. In re DennyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  3. In re MarkowitzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ludecke v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Minoru YasuiDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1942
  3. Nurge v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
  4. D. Signore Et Ux. v. Vulc. Det. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. J.G.G. v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API