Legal Opinion

Grace v. Agricultural Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

The summons in each of the above-entitled actions was served upon Kenneth C. Estabrook of Binghamton, a local agent for each of the defendants. As such he has the general power to solicit fire insurance, countersign, issue and deliver policies and collect premiums in accordance with the rules and regulations of the respective companies and such instructions as may be given him by their respective officers and general or special agents. The policy is binding when issued but he makes daily reports to the company which may accept or cancel it. The company is bound by his acts unless and until it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ives v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Seldin v. Caledonian InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bain & Brickenhoff v. Globe InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hotel Glenmore, Inc. v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API