Legal Opinion
Schaut v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 8, 1984No. 82 C 2304PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROVITZ, Senior District Judge.
Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs Charles D. Schaut, Albert Reich, John Cheek, Norman Krah and Michael H. Smith bring this action pro se against the United States of America and the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service alleging that the withholding of taxes from their wages and the payment of these taxes is in violation of the authority granted under the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief. The Court’s jurisdiction is allegedly invoked pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. John L. CheekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- John L. Cheek v. John Doe, Tom Ludwig, and James R. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Cheek v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Cheek v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- John Michael Crim v. Tad Technical Services Corporation, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992