Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Parkhill Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 11, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

Before the entering of an order in pursuance of the opinion heretofore filed in this cause, (ante p. 105) the solicitor for Gill produced what he contends are satisfactory authorities in support of the suggestion that the decree should reserve the right to Gill to assert in any other litigation his claim to be a stockholder.

Gill, on the showing in his petition for leave to intervene that he was a stockholder, was admitted.as a party defendant. Later the complainant petitioned that he be ejected as a party on the ground that he was not in the eyes of equity a stockholder and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Honsinger v. . Union Carriage Gear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Prondzinski v. GarbuttNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cochran v. CouperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1837
  4. Jones v. CarpenterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
  5. Reed v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chadwick v. Parkhill Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API