Legal Opinion

Howland v. Fenner Mfg. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Upon the trial, the letters and communications between the parties, . concerning the transaction referred to in plaintiff’s itemized statement of account, were offered and received in evidence without objection. In addition to this, the plaintiff was permitted, over the objection and exception of the defendant, separately made and taken to each, to introduce in evidence and to read to the jury, 27 exhibits, none of which contained any reference to any point or matter in issue, or were in any way connected with the persons or transactions mentioned or referred to in the itemized statement of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayden v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Taylor v. WinnOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Godvig v. LopezOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Savage Adm'x v. PalmerOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API