Legal Opinion

Brenton State Bank of Jefferson v. Tiffany

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1987No. 85-1789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

The defendants in a replevin action appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff bank (the bank) for money damages in lieu of possession of collateral. Their primary contention on appeal is that the indebtedness upon which the bank’s claims in the replevin action are based had been fully merged in a judgment entered in favor of the bank against these defendants in a separate action. Accordingly, defendants urge that the bank should not be permitted to obtain two judgments on the same underlying indebtedness. For reasons hereinafter stated, we agree with appellant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wederath v. BrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Schnuettgen v. MathewsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Watson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brenton State Bank of Jefferson v. TiffanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Graber v. Iowa District Court for Washington CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Faber v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Farm Credit Bank of Omaha v. FaughtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API