Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Douglas County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Douglas County. The facts are stated in the opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Prim, O. J. :

The appellant claimed three thousand dollars as damages for the opening of a county road through his premises.

The viewers appointed by the county court to assess the damages claimed by appellant reported that in their judgment the premises were of no less value with the road laid out through them than they were without it; and hence that appellant' was not entitled to any damage.

*329Whereupon the county court, having adopted the report of the viewers, ordered the road to be opened. From this order the appellant appealed to the circuit court, where the issue, as to how…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CoombsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Westfall v. ShookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rudder v. Limestone CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. State v. TownsendOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Yoran v. SageOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Klaber's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API