Casey v. Douglas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). This road was attempted to be laid out under the provisions of § 5249 Crawford & Moses’ Digest, which has been held to be constitutional, and to provide an independent method of authorizing the laying out and establishment of roads without giving notice, appointment of viewers, etc. Sloan v. Lawrence County, 134 Ark. 121, 203 S. W. 260; McMahan v. Ruble, 135 Ark. 83, 204 S. W. 746. This statute has been amended by act No. 611 of the Acts of 1923, approved March 23, 1923, which was in force when this proceeding' was begun. The amending statute' included all…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sloan v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- McMahan v. RubleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Webb v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Arkansas State Highway Comm. v. Hammock, Chan.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Crawford County v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Dowdle v. Raney, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Southwestern Water Co. v. MerrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.